A case study showing how financial mediation helped separated parents reach a practical agreement supporting their family’s future after separation.
.jpg)
The following case study is fictional but reflects situations commonly encountered in family mediation.
When Emma and David contacted a family mediator, they both agreed on two important things.
Firstly, they wanted to continue sharing the care of their two young children equally. Secondly, they knew they needed to sell the family home following their separation.
What they could not agree on was what should happen next.
Both in their late thirties, Emma and David had been together for eleven years and had two children aged two and four. They both worked full-time and had always shared parenting responsibilities. After separating, they remained committed to sharing the care of their children equally and wanted them to continue enjoying meaningful relationships with both parents.
However, agreeing how to divide the proceeds from the sale of their jointly owned home proved much more difficult.
Neither wanted the stress, delay or expense of asking a court to make decisions on their behalf. Instead, they decided to explore family mediation.
Before attending their first joint mediation meeting, Emma and David were each asked to complete a Financial Disclosure Form.
They also prepared details of their anticipated monthly income, expenditure, assets and liabilities following separation.
Like many separating couples, they had each formed their own view about how the proceeds from the sale of the family home should be divided.
Emma believed the proceeds should be divided equally because they intended to share the care of the children equally.
David saw things slightly differently. Whilst he also wanted both of them to have financial security after the separation, he felt that dividing the proceedsequally would not necessarily reflect the different financial commitments they would each face once they were living in separate households.
Although they would both care for the children for the same amount of time, his employer required him to start work earlier each morning. On the days the children stayed with him, he would need to arrange and pay for regular wrap around childcare before school. Those additional costs would continue for several years and would affect both his monthly outgoings and the amount he was likely to be able to borrow for a new home.
Before mediation, both believed their position was entirely understandable.
The role of the mediator was not to decide who was right or wrong, but to help them understand one another's circumstances, consider all of the available information and explore practical options together.
During their first joint meeting, the information from both Financial Disclosure Forms was brought together into a single financial schedule.
For the first time since separating, Emma and David were looking at exactly the same financial information.
This helped remove assumptions and allowed the discussions to focus on facts rather than estimates.
Together, they reviewed their current financial position before considering what each hoped life might look like after the family home had been sold.
As is sometimes the case, there was a significant gap between what each hoped life would look like after separation and what their finances would realistically allow.
Rather than becoming discouraged, mediation gave them the opportunity to explore how that gap might be narrowed.
The next stage involved looking at each person's mortgage borrowing capacity.
Although Emma and David had similar incomes, their future financial commitments were different.
David's projected monthly expenditure was higher because of the childcare costs he would need to meet during his parenting time. Those ongoing expenses reduced the amount he was likely to be able to borrow.
The location of their future homes also became an important discussion.
Because of the ages of the children, both parents agreed it was important that they continued attending the same nursery and, in time, the same primary school. Living within a reasonable distance of one another would allow both parents to continue sharing nursery drop-offs, school runs and the children's activities without unnecessary disruption.
The challenge was finding a way for both parents to purchase suitable homes within the same local area.
As they explored the figures together, something important became clear.
For the first time, Emma realised that David's proposal had never been about gaining a financial advantage. He was worried that, unless he could afford tolive nearby, sharing the care of the children equally might become much more difficult.
David also began to appreciate that Emma's wish for an equal division had never been about receiving more herself. She simply wanted the reassurance of knowing she could provide a secure home and a stable future as both she and the children adjusted to life after separation.
Understanding each other's concerns helped move the conversation forward.
Initially, the discussion had focused on percentages.
Should the proceeds be divided equally?
Should one parent receive a larger share?
As the conversations continued, however, the focus shifted.
Instead of negotiating over percentages, Emma and David found themselves discussing practical solutions. The conversation moved away from who should receive more money and towards what each of them genuinely needed to move forward after separation.
That included providing suitable homes for the children, while also ensuring that each parent had realistic financial security and the ability to establish separate households.
Rather than competing over the available equity, they began working together to solve the practical challenges they both faced.
After exploring several different options, Emma and David reached an agreement that reflected their individual circumstances whilst recognising the needs of the whole family.
They agreed on a division of the proceeds that would allow both of them to purchase suitable homes within the same local area. The agreement recognised not only the children's needs but also the different financial commitments each parent would face after separation.
They also agreed how the property would be marketed, how offers would be considered and how household expenses would be managed until the sale completed.
By discussing these issues together in mediation, they avoided many of the misunderstandings that can arise when practical decisions are left unresolved.
Looking back, Emma realised that successful financial arrangements were not simply about percentages. They were about understanding each person's circumstances, recognising both parents' needs and finding a practical way forward.
David realised that mediation had given them something that a court process may not have offered quite so readily: the opportunity to work together to create solutions that reflected the realities of their own family.
Neither parent achieved every outcome they had originally imagined.
However, both were able to move forward knowing they had reached an informed agreement based on openness, understanding and the needs of everyone involved.
Many people assume that financial mediation is simply about dividing money.
In reality, it is about much more than that.
Family mediation helps separating couples understand their financial circumstances, explore realistic options and work together to find practical solutionsthat support their children whilst also helping each parent build a secure future after separation.
Every family's circumstances are unique, but Emma and David's story demonstrates an important principle of family mediation. The best agreements are rarely measured by percentages alone. They are built on understanding, informed decision-making and practical solutions that reflect each family's individual circumstances.
If you need to make decisions about your finances, property or future arrangements following separation, family mediation may help you explore your options, improve communication and find a way forward without the need for court proceedings.
To find out more or arrange a MIAM, please get in touch. We would be happy to discuss your circumstances and help you decide whether mediation could be right for your family.
.jpg)